martes, febrero 13, 2007

Una monja, su vagina y Dios

Andrew Sullivan escribe sobre un artículo que una religiosa escribió sobre su lectura de la obra Los Monologos de la Vagina (de Eve Ensler), donde varias mujeres escriben su relación con esa parte de su cuerpo. Lo copio entero:

"A religious sister who has to remain anonymous writes about her surprising appreciation of Eve Ensler's "The Vagina Monologues." Money quote:

The Vagina Monologues celebrates the beauty of the vagina, in direct contrast to the Vm1 message that women have often had to internalize — that it is dirty and not to be touched. For the first time, women have a public forum in which to process their experience in a mature way. So, I am left with the question: Why has "The Vagina Monologues" — which isn’t intended to be sexually arousing or gratuitously vulgar — been protested by a vocal minority of Catholics when it has been offered on Catholic campuses? I wonder if the fully-cassocked seminarians who often participate in these protests understand the pain that many women carry because their sexuality is often denigrated, abused, and defiled? Do they have any sense of the experiences of women that brought the Monologues into existence? ...

The polarization of the sexes that is so deeply imbedded in Catholic thought needs to be reassessed. Perhaps the most damaging has been the characterization of women as either 'virgin' or 'whore', epitomized in the Church’s on-going comparison of Eve and Mary. Throughout the centuries, women have been continually reminded that they are intrinsically a cause of sin and ruin for men just as Eve was the cause of Adam’s ruin, and therefore, the human race. The Virgin Mary, on the other hand is presented as the New Eve, whose cooperation with the Blessed Trinity in our redemption completely reversed the effects of Eve's choice.

The nun goes on to discuss how the doctrine of the virgin birth can lead to Catholic women's estrangement from their own bodies and their own sexuality. Somehow, I sense she will be greeted with scorn for raising these issues. But it is long past time the church started a dialogue on them."

PD. En otro orden de ideas, ¿saben cuántas veces Ratzinger (alias Benedicto XVI) a criticado a las armas nucleares? Cero. ¿A las uniones legales del mismo sexo? Casi diario. ¿Qué es más probable que pueda destruir a la civilización? ¿La guerra nuclear o el amor? Ahí tienen las prioridades de la iglesia católica actual. Ayer Ratzinger digo que la propuesta de uniones civiles para parejas gays que el gobierno italiano quiere pasar es subversiva. ¡Claro que sí! Se quiere subvertir el imperialismo romano que dice hablar por Dios, pero como eso le quita su poder a Ratzinger - y sobre la conciencia de sus miles de sacerdotes homosexuales - su sombra ya empieza a hablar por él.

No hay comentarios.: